In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >Keeping the currect cluster code is a bad idea, if the drivers were >taught how to traverse the linked list in the buf struct rather >than just notice "a big buffer" we could avoid a lot of page >twiddling and also allow for massive IO clustering ( > 64k ) Before we redesign the clustering, I would like to know if we actually have any recent benchmarks which prove that clustering is overall beneficial ? I would think that track-caches and intelligent drives would gain much if not more of what clustering was designed to do gain. I seem to remember Bruce saying that clustering could even hurt ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Greg Lehey
- Re: patches for test / review Greg Lehey
- Re: patches for test / review Mike Smith
- Re: patches for test / review Alfred Perlstein
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Alfred Perlstein
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- I/O clustering, Re: patches for te... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... David Greenman
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... Matthew Dillon
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... Mike Smith
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... Mike Smith
- Re: I/O clustering, Re: patches fo... Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Dan Nelson