On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 11:54:58PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > 
> > Hm. But I'd think that even with modern drives a smaller number of bigger
> > I/Os is preferable over lots of very small I/Os.
> 
> Not necessarily. It depends upon overhead costs per-i/o. With larger I/Os, you
> do pay in interference costs (you can't transfer data for request N because
> the 256Kbytes of request M is still in the pipe).

OK. 256K might be a bit on the high side. 

-- 
Wilko Bulte                     Arnhem, The Netherlands   
http://www.tcja.nl              The FreeBSD Project: http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to