<<On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:52:39 -0800, Arun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > However, I can think of two situations under which it might have to > be a system call: I'm fairly certain I found a circumstance which required that it be available to a system call, but I can't remember quite what it was. (It was some other system call which could accept a ucontext_t.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp Garrett Wollman
- Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp Peter Wemm
- Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}j... Marcel Moolenaar
- ucontext Arun Sharma
- Re: ucontext Daniel Eischen
- Re: ucontext Arun Sharma
- Re: ucontext Daniel Eischen
- Re: ucontext Arun Sharma
- Re: ucontext Garrett Wollman
- Re: ucontext Mark Newton
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Doug Rabson
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Bruce Evans