On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to > use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature. -d<X> is a better place to put this than "-l", as this is a debugging feature. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-pref... Will Andrews
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed ... Chuck Robey
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed ... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescri... Will Andrews
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness pre... Chuck Robey
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness pre... David O'Brien
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed ... Steve Price
- Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescri... David O'Brien