(Replying because I kicked the hornet’s nest when my build failed)
Hi Ben,
> On May 7, 2016, at 00:27, Ben Woods <woods...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed
>> as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with
>> the kernel name included in the path (/boot/kernel.${INSTKERNNAME}). In
>> both cases (source-based upgrades and with pkgbase), the behavior will
>> remain the same.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>
> Hi Glen,
>
> With the recent commit mentioned previously, only the first kernel listed
> in KERNCONF is installed unless make.conf contains the following line:
> NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no
>
> This affects both source-based upgrades (make installkernel) and package
> building (make packages).
>
> Is this the desired behaviour?
The naming is very confusing. It should be:
- MK_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no -> only install one
- MK_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=yes -> install multiple, as gjb@ described above.
Since I kicked the hornet’s nest (and imp@ complained about the NO_*), I’ll
introduce a new WITH/WITHOUT option for this and release/release.sh can use it.
Thanks!
-Ngie
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
