> On May 7, 2016, at 00:46, Ben Woods <woods...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > affects. > > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? > > Glen > > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels > by default. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=299088&view=markup > > Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the commit > itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its interesting, > because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as the behaviour > has changed from the initial announcement.
The behavior in and of itself (to me) is unintuitive. I use a different wrapper script [*] to install kernels with a different name because I want them to be versioned based on $KERNCONF + revision data. I only fixed building multiple kernels because the change that glebius tested didn’t work with more than one KERNCONF (hence the double commit). I think the default behavior should be “yes” (not “no”) as many folks use a single KERNCONF, not multiple (on head), but I’m biased in this thinking... Thanks! -Ngie * https://github.com/yaneurabeya/scratch/blob/master/bayonetta/root/bin/installkernel.sh _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
