Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> [shifting conversation to -current .. ]
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > on Tor, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:46:34pm +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, it has been working quite stably here too. Besides, one must do
> > > a "tunefs -n enable" for every partition that he or she wants to do
> > > softupdates anyway, so just adding the support for softupdates to the
> > > GENERIC kernel won't hurt anyone who don't want to turn that feature
> > > on by default, except a little code increase.
> >
> > Please take a look at what NetBSD just recently did:
> > http://www.netbsd.org/Changes/#softdepsmount
> >
> > These changes disables the whole 'tunefs' process, and let you control
> > softupdates state with mount, (-o softdep). So all you have to do is to
> > tune your /etc/fstab to enable softupdates. I think this will make it
> > more easy to enable SOFTUPDATES by default.
>
> I like this. Would anyone object if this was brought over from NetBSD ?
>
They obvioulsly DIDN'T discuss this with Kirk!
this is not what he wants and for good reason..
see the long discussion son this topic in the archives.
> Adrian
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd Build a man a fire, and he's warm for the
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rest of the evening. Set a man on fire and
> he's warm for the rest of his life.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000
)_.---._/ presently in: Budapest
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
