On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: > > filesystem? > > > > (CC'ing jhb@ and tychon@, who might have better insight) > > If we can swing it, I think the best model here should have always > been that userboot uses the host's scripts but the guest's > loader.conf. The current model doesn't tolerate any mismatch between > host and guest and looks unsustainable.
Yeah, I have a FreeBSD-10, and a HardendBSD-12 VM, and BOTH failed until I loaded the old /boot/userboot.so to my host. We really need to tolerate this condition, and NOT surprise the user. > > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
