On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: >> > filesystem? >> > >> >> (CC'ing jhb@ and tychon@, who might have better insight) >> >> If we can swing it, I think the best model here should have always >> been that userboot uses the host's scripts but the guest's >> loader.conf. The current model doesn't tolerate any mismatch between >> host and guest and looks unsustainable. > > Yeah, I have a FreeBSD-10, and a HardendBSD-12 VM, and BOTH failed until > I loaded the old /boot/userboot.so to my host. > > We really need to tolerate this condition, and NOT surprise the user.
Right. That's what we're trying to figure out here, the best route forward to make this stuff reliably work. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
