On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:35:32 -0600 Alan Somers <asom...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:13 PM Larry Rosenman <l...@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > > On 07/25/2019 1:10 pm, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:05 PM Larry Rosenman <l...@freebsd.org> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Um.... Who broke this? ... > > > "svn blame" suggests r350199 by kib. However, refcount.h should > > > only be included if lsof defines _KERNEL, which normal programs > > > shouldn't. So I think this should be considered a bug in lsof. > > > -Alan > > > > > > we *HAVE* to define _KERNEL, to get at the kernel structures..... > > Then I think you have to live with this amount of instability. > refcount(9) says that you should include <sys/param.h>. Did you do > that? If so, then this is a man page bug and refcount(9) should also > specify stdbool.h. > -Alan <sys/param.h> includes <sys/types.h> already, which typedefs bool. So <sys/param.h> should suffice to include in lsof. - Justin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
