On 16/06/2022 15:56, Rick Macklem wrote:
Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
On 24/01/2022 16:13, Rick Macklem wrote:

[...]

So, I think Mark and Yuri are correct and looking at up to date
Illumos sources is the next step.
(As I mentioned, porting the Apple sources is beyond what I am
   willing to attempt.)

rick

Hello Rick,
I would like to ask you I there is some progress with porting newer
SMBFS / CIFS version to FreeBSD? Did you find Illumos sources as a
possibility where to start porting?
Yes. I have the stuff off Illumos-gate, which I think is pretty up-to-date
and I agree that it should be easier than the Apple stuff to port into
FreeBSD.  I don't think it is "straightforward" as someone involved
with Illumos said, due to the big differences in VFS/locking, but...

Having said the above, I have not done much yet. I've been cleaning up
NFS stuff, although I am nearly done with that now.
I do plan on starting to work on it soon, but have no idea if/when I
will have something that might be useful for others.

I'm glad to hear that.

We have more and more problems with current state of mount_smbfs. I
would be really glad if "somebody" can do the heroic work of
implementing SMBv2 in FreeBSD.
Maybe it's time to start some fundraising for sponsoring this work?
Well, funding isn't an issue for me (I'm just a retired guy who does this
stuff as a hobby). However, if there is someone else who is capable of
doing it if they are funded, I have no problem with that.
I could either help them, or simply stick with working on NFS and leave
SMBv23 to them.

Sorry, but I cannot report real progress on this as yet, rick

No need to sorry. I really appreciate your endless work on NFS and that you still have kind of interest to try porting SMBv2/3.
Unfortunately I don't know anybody else trying to do this tremendous work.

Kind regards
Miroslav Lachman

Reply via email to