Mark Saad <nones...@longcount.org> wrote: [stuff snipped] > So I am looking at the Apple and Solaris code, provided by rick. I am not > sure if the illumos code provides SMB2 support. They based the solaris > code on Apple SMB-217.x which is from OSX 10.4 . Which I am sure > predates smb2 . > > https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-217.19 > > If I am following this correctly we need to look at Apple's smb client > from OSX 10.9 which is where I start to see bits about smb2 > > https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-697.95.1/kernel/netsmb > > This is also where this stuff starts to look less and less like FreeBSD . > Let me ask some of the illumos people I know to see if there is > anything they can point to. Yes. Please do so. I saw the "old" calls fo things like open and the new ntcreate version, so I assumed that was the newer SMB. If it is not, there is no reason to port it.
The new Apple code is a monster. 10x the lines of C and a lot of weird stuff that looks Apple specific. It might actually be easier to write SMBv2 from the spec than port the Apple stuff. --> I'll try and look at whatever Microsoft publishes w.r.t. SMBv2/3. Thanks for looking at this, rick -- mark saad | nones...@longcount.org<mailto:nones...@longcount.org>
