In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Garrett Wollman writes: : It's required if we ever get around to supporting secure set-id shell : scripts. (I think this was the rationale for originally introducing : it.) It also helps when bogus programs refuse to read from the : standard input. I'd like to see us enable that. It would remove the need to have setuid perl, for example. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: superduperopen(3) (was:... Peter van Dijk
- Re: superduperopen(3) (was:... Gerhard Sittig
- RE: superduperopen(3) (was:... Tony Johnson
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a dev... Adrian Filipi-Martin
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to ... Bruce Evans
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming... Adrian Filipi-Martin
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs n... Frank Mayhar
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs n... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a dev... Ben Smithurst
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs n... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs n... Warner Losh
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you! Robert Watson
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you! Johnny Eriksson
- /proc & /dev/std* [Was: Fdescfs updates--com... Konstantin Chuguev
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you! John Baldwin
- Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you! Donn Miller