<<On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:23:43 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It is strictly correct for POSIX.1-1990, but FreeBSD-2 never had the > requirement until now. POSIX.1-200x is relaxing similar requirements > (I'm not sure about this one), so it is too late to start enforcing it. Yes. All POSIX headers which are defined to use specific foo_t types are (will be) defined to declare those types as well. This reflects SUSv2 behavior which was imported into the new POSIX. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- more endian.h breakage; patch included. Steven G. Kargl
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included. Bruce Evans
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included. Steve Kargl
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included... Bruce Evans
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch incl... Tony Fleisher
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch incl... Garrett Wollman
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included. Brian Somers
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included... Bruce Evans
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch incl... Brian Somers
- Re: more endian.h breakage; patch... Bruce Evans
- platform byte order macros? Konstantin Chuguev
- Re: platform byte order m... Bruce Evans
- Re: platform byte order m... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: platform byte order m... Mike Smith
- Re: platform byte order m... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: platform byte order m... Ruslan Ermilov