On 06-Feb-01 Andrea Campi wrote:
>> > Besides the obvious need to fix this one problem, shouldn't we
>> > ASSERT ih->ih_handler != NULL before calling it?
>>
>> It isn't null in this case, it is 0xdeadc0de. Can you try a pre-preemption
>> kernel and see if that fixes it?
>
> *BLUSH* Of course ehehe ;-)
>
> Ok, I will. Can you give me a date I should try going back to, without kernel
> getting out of sync with my world?
Umm, this is the commit you want to be before:
jake 2001/01/31 19:34:21 PST
Modified files:
sys/alpha/alpha interrupt.c machdep.c
sys/i386/isa ithread.c npx.c
Log:
Implement preemptive scheduling of hardware interrupt threads.
...
A kernel on the 30th or so should work fine with an up to date world.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
