[ cc's trimmed, moved to -current ] On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > So long as it is not forced unconditionally to be static. I agree. > b) I've not seen the numbers for this. If it is only 1% faster, it > doesn't make sense, even though it sounds good on paper. I will perform careful benchmarks and publish results. Can people wait until that is done before moving forward please? Give me until Saturday. -- wca