> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> > > >
> > > > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
> > > > it was an experiment, a sample test designed to only be used in -current
> > > > /usr/src/lib, that BDE, Sheldon and myself had long followon conversations
> > > > about, and got dropped into the cracks.
> > >
> > > What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*?
> >
> > Simple orthagonality. Ie, each bsd.*.mk file typically has a seperate
> > set of *{DIR/OWN/GRP/MODE} specs. bsd.inc.mk was cloned from another
> > bsd.*.mk file.
>
> Well, I don't mind how it gets fixed, but it's very unorthogonal at
> the moment having to set two sets of OWN/GRP variables in order to
> make includes as non-root.
>
> Someone tell me what they should be using and I'll fix it.
Change bsd.own.mk to:
INCOWN?= ${BINOWN}
INCGRP?= ${BINGRP}
INCMODE?= ${NOBINMODE}
as a temporary hack until INC* and bsd.inc.mk is completed/gutted/replaced/
whatever.
--
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
