> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 14:07:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to > > > call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think > > > opiechallenge() "consumes" a challenge). Use opielookup() instead. > > > > Even better, opie_haskey() (which is a wrapper around opielookup()). > > New patch attached. > > Yes, this patch works as expected, but I doubt about opie_haskey() status. > It looks like non-standard FreeBSD addition since it is in the local > opieextra.c file and not in contrib/opie. If you care about > machine independance, better use opielookup() directly.
No, that is OK. :-) The FreeBSD PAM modules are all written from scratch as BSD PAM modules. M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
