On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:59:49AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the > > > scientific community calls an "engineering problem" :) > > Please name it "apr-snapshot" or "apr-beta" rather than -devel if you do. > > One never is sure what "devel" is supose to mean -- something used in > > development, or an in-development version. > > Actually, we figured out that we'd just link apr statically into the > subversion binaries, so there is no need (yet) for an apr port.
I've got a version of the port that links statically, so if people think that's enough for now, we can go with that, but I've also got the apache people to put up a tarball of apr, so I'm putting together an apr-snapshot port as well, since subversion provides a bunch of C libraries that are less than useful without apr. -garrett -- garrett rooney Unix was not designed to stop you from [EMAIL PROTECTED] doing stupid things, because that would http://electricjellyfish.net/ stop you from doing clever things. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message