BTW feel free to spend some time helping try figire out why libc_r is bombing out. It's not an exclusive club :-)
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Ok so Usability for the average command line user is > very good. David Xu tracked down a problem that was > eluding me with SMP machines. Matt is tracking down > something that may be giving some instability > but may also be related to what David found. > He however gets the award for most confusing > debug messages when he managed to get both of his CPUs > to enter teh debugger at the same time. I thought that was > impossible, but it definitly happenned. (or it certainly > looked that way to me :-) > > The big problem at the moment is that something in the > source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > (a bit ironic really). > > A libc_r imported from a system that is not yet upgraded to have > KSE sources works fine. A libc_r from a KSE machine > will not work correctly on the KSE machine or the pre-KSE machine. > > The sources are identical, so some thing else in the tree must be > influencing its correctness. > > the result of this problem is that KDE and Gnome apps that > are linked with a libc_r created on this system. > > The test directory in the libc sources is giving me some avenues to > work on but I must say, given allthe things that could have gone wrong > in the kernel, I'm surprised that the largest problem seems to > have come from a userland library that I haven't touched :-/ > > julian > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
