On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > Good idea. > > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and it > had the same problem (or so they said).
Well, it certainly looks wrong to use TAILQ_REMOVE inside of TAILQ_FOREACH, so either libc_r should be changed or queue.h should be reverted. Also, enabling the queue macro debugging will definitely break libc_r too. > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > > lian Elischer writes: > > >The big problem at the moment is that something in the > > >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > > >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > > >(a bit ironic really). > > > > Is the new > > > > (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; > > > > in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old > > bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. > > > > Ian -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
