I put the -1 under the conditional so it should be 'gone' now. we'll see it makes a difference.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :... > :another queue using the same link. There are other places in libc_r > :where we do re-use the same link (remove from one list and add to > :another), but roll our own loop in that case: > : > : for (p = TAILQ_FIRST(&q); p != NULL; p = p_next) { > : p_next = TAILQ_NEXT(p, p_qe); > : ... > : TAILQ_REMOVE(&q, pthread, p_qe); > : ... > : } > : > :-- > :Dan Eischen > > Why don't we simply conditionalize sys/queue.h for the _KERNEL > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: sys/sys/queue.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sys/queue.h,v > retrieving revision 1.50 > diff -u -r1.50 queue.h > --- sys/sys/queue.h 29 Jun 2002 19:16:10 -0000 1.50 > +++ sys/sys/queue.h 2 Jul 2002 16:28:24 -0000 > @@ -102,7 +102,11 @@ > * _REMOVE + + + + > * > */ > -#define QUEUE_MACRO_DEBUG 0 > +#ifdef _KERNEL > +#define QUEUE_MACRO_DEBUG 0 /* change this for kernel debugging */ > +#else > +#define QUEUE_MACRO_DEBUG 0 /* leave alone for userland compatibility */ > +#endif > #if QUEUE_MACRO_DEBUG > /* Store the last 2 places the queue element or head was altered */ > struct qm_trace { > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message