On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 16:07, Julian Elischer wrote: > ok, so you are saying that GNOME stuff works fine? > What do yuo have running and is there still anything that does the wrong > thing?
I just did an update of -CURRENT about 4 hours ago, and everything in GNOME works fine except nautilus. Nautilus hangs indefinitely taking up almost all of the CPU. Once it's killed, other GNOME apps respond again. This is -CURRENT kernel+world minus your recent queue.h commit. I can get a back trace if you'd like. Joe > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > > After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers into > > the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's what I get > > for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed this almost > > immediately except for some bad info from me. > > > Good idea. > > > > > > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and > > > it had the same problem (or so they said). > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > > > >> In message > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > > >> lian Elischer writes: > > >> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the > > >> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > > >> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > > >> >(a bit ironic really). > > >> > > >> Is the new > > >> > > >> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; > > >> > > >> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs > > >> in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. > > >> > > >> Ian > > >> > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
