On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in > > 5.x. Am I wrong? > > We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being > suggested. > > I believe it is that 5.x a.out binaries not be supported. However, 2.x > a.out binaries will be supported. This is different thatn "drop all > traces of a.out support". yes binary support will remain.. if you need to generate new ones (?) unpack a 2.2.6 system into a chroot tree (jail?) and make it there :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Jake Burkholder
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Bruce Evans
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Bruce Evans
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Alexander Kabaev
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Gordon Tetlow
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Matthew Emmerton
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Garrett Wollman
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Bruce Evans
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Terry Lambert
- web browsers (was: Re: aout sup... David Schultz
- Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout... Michael WARDLE