Doug Rabson wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > It almost doesn't matter which of the solutions we use as long as we do > something. What we currently have is clearly wrong but I'll list it along > with the others. Solutions so far proposed are:
[ ... ] > 2. Define weak _pthread_* symbols in libc and probably weak pthread_* > symbols either in libc or somewhere else (libXThrStub?). A pthreads > implementation defines strong _pthread_* and strong pthread_*. This is the > linux solution (without the _pthread_* indirection). Actually, Alexander was suggesting: > 2. Define weak _pthread_* symbols in libc and weak pthread_* symbols > in libc. A pthreads implementation defines strong _pthread_* and > **does not define** pthread_*. This is the Solaris solution. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
