On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:42:57PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:58:14PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > See the new WANT_COMPAT4_STDIO make.conf knob.
> > > 
> > > This won't be acceptable as the vender will likely not be producing a
> > > separate 5.0 build (ie the same build needs to run on both.) until 4.x is
> > > EOLed.  Forcing people to rebuild libc seems a high barrier to entry.
> > > 
> > 
> > Maybe I misunderstand you.  But, a person running FreeBSD 5.x,
> > who wants to runs this vendor's 4.x software, will need to
> > build their libc with WANT_COMPAT4_STDIO defined if this
> > product needs to see __sF.
> 
> No; you're mixing things up. The compat4x stuff we have now allows
> you to run 4.x binaries on 5.x. The problem that WANT_COMPAT4_STDIO
> addresses is *compiling* 4.x compatible programs on 5.x! A world
> of difference.
> 

I just looked through /usr/lib on the 4.7 live ISO.  We are
missing a bunch of libraries.  See another post with the list.

-- 
Steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to