In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Murray wr ites:
>We have most of this, and RC4 can deliver. RC4's "licence" is >fine. Call it "ArCFour" and there is no problem. The code is >small, fast and repeatable, and meets conditions 1-4 above. There are some concerns about RC4's strength and predictability. In cases were we just want trivial "randomness", this doesn't matter, but when we start to seed it with /dev/random to get good randomness we to be more careful. Maybe we should spend an AES on it, just in case ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
