On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 17:30:48 +0000, Mark Murray wrote:
> >
> > Why not? Arc4 is a) deterministic and b) good for all bits.
>
> If you mean arc4random() function - not, because it use true randomness,
> if you mean RC4 algorithm, probably yes, but we should compare its
> distribution with our current variant and be sure that speed is
> acceptable. What form RC4 distribution have?
>

arc4 is the "non-encumbered" name for rc4 that is not derived from RSA
code

> --
> Andrey A. Chernov
> http://ache.pp.ru/
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to