On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:39:50 -0800, Bakul Shah wrote: > > Note that it is rand() that is broken, not random() as can be > seen by modifying Kris Kennaways' test so I don't see why > Mark Murray was talking about changing it in the first place.
About correlation bug: it is srand() which is broken, not rand(). It is common practice for this type of PRNGs to throw out N values after seeding to remove correlation and srand() not follow this. My first patch fix this. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
