On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:13:12PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote: > At 11:54 AM 2/2/2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > >> Ok, I admit, no matter how it happened, an application using the wrong > >libc > >> is a bad thing. > >> > >> But, how are things supposed to work? > > > >Apps that need the old libc.so.4 will find it in > >/usr/lib/compat/libc.so.4 (or /usr/lib/libc.so.4 if you didn't remove > >it, for that matter). > > Well, things were definitely picking /usr/lib/libc.so.4 over anything in > compat. Should sysinstall have nuked my /usr/lib/libc if it was putting the > correct one in compat? > /usr/src/lib/compat/Makefile.inc takes care of cleaning /usr/lib when it installs stuff into /usr/lib/compat. I don't think that the "binary upgrade" option of sysinstall(8) offers this service.
Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
msg51675/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
