On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:37:50PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of: > "local.freebsd.current" wrote: > > I've been hanging on for a production-ready FreeBSD which > > supports ACLs so I can replace an NFS server and an NT > > fileserver with one box which can do both. > > > > Changing company circumstances mean that I am forced to > > look to doing that now, rather than waiting for 5.1 or > > 5.2. > > > > So I'd appreciate feedback from anyone who is using 5.0 > > as a Samba server with ACL support - is it indistinguishable > > from an NT fileserver from the client POV? > > ACLs in UFS are not the same thing as ACLs in NT, they are > POSIX ACLs, implement as part of MAC (Mandatory Access Controls) > requirements. > > Do not expect them to interoperate with Samba as if Samba were > an NT server that supported NT ACLs. > > Same thing for ACLs in Linux and other UNIX OS's, BTW: they > tend to comply with the POSIX standard, not with the NT stuff, > for which I don't think there is a published standard (only > documentation).
Erm, Terry, I think jedgar@ got ACL's working with Windows NT and so did I (think) in one of my Samba+ACL's test. Please check the following URL(s) regarding Samba+ACLs: - http://people.freebsd.org/~jedgar/ACL/ - http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/fs-acl.html - http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/whatsnew/samba-2.2.6.html Samba 2.2.6 should work with ACLs with an 'external patch'. See it's release notes for more information. Hope that helps. Cheers. -- Hiten Pandya ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
