Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Many programs (from ports too) defines _ISOC99_SOURCE to get C99 > functions, but we don't sense this define currently. Here is the fix for > review:
Cool. I didn't realize there was an existing precedence, or I would have used it. > --- cdefs.h.bak Wed Oct 23 05:04:06 2002 > +++ cdefs.h Mon Mar 10 09:11:01 2003 > @@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ > #define __POSIX_VISIBLE 198808 > #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 0 > #endif /* _POSIX_C_SOURCE */ > +#ifdef _ISOC99_SOURCE > +#define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1999 > +#endif This part isn't needed... > #else > /*- > * Deal with _ANSI_SOURCE: > @@ -378,7 +381,7 @@ > #define __XSI_VISIBLE 0 > #define __BSD_VISIBLE 0 > #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1990 > -#elif defined(_C99_SOURCE) /* Localism to specify strict C99 env. */ > +#elif defined(_ISOC99_SOURCE) /* Strict C99 env. */ > #define __POSIX_VISIBLE 0 > #define __XSI_VISIBLE 0 > #define __BSD_VISIBLE 0 ...since the next line here is: #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1999 Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
