Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:49:43 -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > 1) Any _POSIX_C_SOURCE with _ISOC99_SOURCE. It is from real life example > > > (ImageMagick). It wants lower POSIX level, *but* wants _ISOC99_SOURCE in > > > the same time. > > > > I don't like this at all. The meaning of _ANSI_SOURCE is that the > > source is exclusively written in C89 with no BSD, POSIX, or XSI > > extentions. Similarly, I was intending _C99_SOURCE to be used without > > any POSIX. Programs looking for C99+POSIX functions should specify > > POSIX.1-2001, which incorporates both of these. > > What to do, if, say, C99 program want to use some POSIX functions from > lower (and not from higher) POSIX standard?
I think this is pretty rare. POSIX provides application writers with lots of time to transition away from deprecated interfaces. What functions are missing if you change _POSIX_C_SOURCE to 200112L and remove _ISOC99_SOURCE from the code you posted? Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
