On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-)
Warner might, but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop. I susect theat this puts much of the work on a few people rather than many. I hope it doesn't require a volley of emails to each port maintainer to resolve each one. People have jumped off buildings for less than that! -- John Birrell _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
