In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-)
:
: Warner might
It appreas to unbreak one port: icecast. It was the first port I
found so I assumed many ports were that way, but I couldn't find any
others having gone and looked at the breakage right now.
: but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option
: to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating
: the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop.
I'd be cool with this. I don't think the 'unfreeze the ports' option
is a viable one, which leaves us with this.
Warner
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
