Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
I'm perfectly happy to support the libkse->libpthread switch, and I'm
perfectly happy to support making libpthread be the default threading
library. But, I strongly believe that we need to also treat -pthread
sanely.
You have to decide what the therading lib should be indeed.
However recent expirence shows that a 1:n model seems to be the
one the world over you is gearing around: Linux never did anything else.
Windows anyway. Solaris switched from n:m to 1:n on the step between
version 8 and 9.... Having two of them isn't the solution for me as a developer
since I'm simply not interresed in debugging both cases.
This is a reason why -pthread shouldn't imply linking
to any one library. If you only want to deal with
libthr or libthread (KSE in 1:1 mode), then you are
free to choose them and only them.
Last time I heard that "this is a link time option". So you are supposed
to change the lib under the hood of the applications controll.
Making -ptherad empty is silly. If you are going to disable this
perfectly sensible compiler switch then BY EVERY MEANS better make it BREAK
CYRING ABOUT THIS FACT. But don't just silent it....
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
