I guess I don't see the problem. What is wrong with ports adding startup scripts to /etc/rc.d? For certain ports, that is the only way to get the startup dependencies right (like making sure openldap or postgresql starts before your mail system). This will become more important as more of the base system moves to ports/packages.
Just refine the note in UPDATING to specifically state which startup scripts to remove, rather than "rm -rf /etc/rc.d/*".
As I wrote im my previous mail we could import wrapper scripts for such basic services, since there are only few services that are so generic, that they have to be available so early in boot order.
I strongly would dislike creating ports to install stuff under /etc/<whatever>.
This would start to violate things for what I liked FreeBSD for all these many years and I hope/think other have the same feeling concerning this.
Andreas ///
But that kinda defeats the purpose of RCNG. One of the best features of RCNG is that it makes it easier to add/delete applications from the system. Not using it for this purpose reduces its utility.
Let's not let the typical BSD traditionalism get in the way of using RCNG for what it's designed. Don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating Linux-style integration of packages/ports. But this seems fairly harmless.
Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
