In message: <401095.35021...@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com> paradox <ddkp...@yahoo.com> writes: : iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory : as is done in openbsd and netbsd : : ie : #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch : #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/ : : Would it ever done in freebsd?
No. That ship sailed in 1995. Besides, it would be the mother of all bikesheds. Do we want to have a sys/cpu/{mips,x86,arm,etc} for CPU support and a sys/arch/$MACHINE for support for machines that use that, how does that interact with source doe that assumes certain things in machine/foo.h. Or do we want to have better organized sub-ports. Do we want to reorg config while we're at it, and what about modules. And sys/dev is too crowded, let's fix that too while we're at it. The end result: gridlock and nothing will happen. Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"