On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:28:24AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > FWIW, NetBSD's charter has been to run their OS on a number of > architectures, not just a primary set of architectures; OpenBSD's > charter differs -- if we all were NetBSD or OpenBSD, then we'd all be > using the same thing. But we aren't and that's probably not going to > change anytime soon [at least not without community backing and a
We aren't? At this point it seems any architecture an be brought into FreeBSD without regard to critical mass or ability to support it to the standards of our past. I do believe FreeBSD's character does not include chasing every embedded platform where there is energy and talent for the initial port. -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
