On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 Patrick Powell <papow...@astart.com> wrote:
> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > /usr/compat > > However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > /usr/compat. > > Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > place (just out of curiosity)? > > Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc? > Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > added to the > libraries for linux emulation? > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) but in my /etc/fstab I have linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's used. -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
