On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
Patrick Powell <papow...@astart.com> wrote:
The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
/usr/compat
However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to
/usr/compat.
Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take
place (just out of curiosity)?
Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc?
Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be
added to the
libraries for linux emulation?
/compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat
linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local)
but in my /etc/fstab I have
linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's
used.
# uname -a
FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue
Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# ls -l / |grep compat
drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat
# ls -l /usr |grep compat
drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat
Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links.
--
Patrick Powell Astart Technologies
papow...@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X
Network and System San Diego, CA 92019
Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435
Web: www.astart.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
