Karl Denninger wrote: > I've found FreeBSD to outperform NT-anything in any task you throw at the > machine from web service to Samba for file and print service for PCs > running Windows. Granted. Perhaps we're seeing an artifact of NT's developers focussing on optimizing their system for good benchmark performance rather than good real-world performance. 'twill be interesting to see the offical report to find out where the various strengths and weaknesses really are. - mark ---- Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W) Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H) Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82232999 "Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous

