> Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek > >their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and > >768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform > >on "lower-end" hardware. They also allowed the RedHat dudes to > >switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array. > >How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration? > > It's stupid to tune everything for performance except for the web > server -- they should be using Zeus, not Apache. The Zeus evaluation license prohibits its use for benchmarks, and the Zeus folks failed to respond to any of my attempts to communicate. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous
- Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Anonymous

