> You don't seem to understand that a runaway process/one designed just > to take up memory will be much more active than your little IMAP servers, > and be the one killed, if this scheme were used. No, what I don't understand is how the current behaviour can tell that my temporary and *valid* need for a large chunk of memory does not make me a runaway process, and therefore subject to death. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (pa... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (pa... David Greenman
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (pa... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (pa... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for gr... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for gr... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for gr... lyndon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement fo... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement fo... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement fo... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for gr... Ted Faber
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for gr... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement fo... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacemen... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Repla... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacemen... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement fo... Sean Witham