On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine
> > with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in
> > each direction. Same result.
>
> Weird. I'm unable to reproduce it; my test box responds to UDP queries
> but does not log them (though it logs TCP queries). I'll update to the
> latest inetd and try again.
I can reproduce it using version 1.63, ktracing shows:
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x1,0x82001)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 0
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 532481/0x82001
3052 inetd CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfd5e4,0)
3052 inetd RET gettimeofday 0
3052 inetd CALL write(0xc,0xbfbfd60c,0x1a)
3052 inetd RET write -1 errno 39 Destination address required
3052 inetd CALL select(0x14,0xbfbfd750,0,0,0)
3052 inetd RET select 2
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x1,0x82001)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 0
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 532481/0x82001
3052 inetd CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfd6f4,0)
3052 inetd RET gettimeofday 0
3052 inetd CALL write(0xe,0xbfbfd708,0x4)
3052 inetd RET write -1 errno 39 Destination address required
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x1,0x82001)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 0
3052 inetd CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0)
3052 inetd RET sigprocmask 532481/0x82001
It also seems to leave several hung processes around which are serveing
disgard and echo.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
