I like the ability at secure level 3 to only reset the counters forward..
It fits in with such things as the "append only" flag.
Maybe a new keyword. "advance"
julian
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> >
> > :That doesn't mean we shouldn't allow people to have an unsophisticated setup,
> > :just because a sophisticated one is available. It would be useful to have
> > :a per-firewall-rule counter, decrement it on each match if logging and
> > :set, and be able to reset to something higher.
> > :
> > : Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
> >
> > There may be some confusion here. I am advocating that we *allow* the
> > zeroing of counters at secure level 3.
>
> Which is what I am advocating against.
>
> >
> > -Matt
> > Matthew Dillon
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
> >
>
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
> FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
