Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

[Nate Williams]

> I like the ability at secure level 3 to only reset the counters forward..
> It fits in with such things as the "append only" flag.

Then we'd have to implement per-rule counters that default to
IPFW_VERBOSE_LIMIT but that could be changed to anything.  That's a very
different setup than what we currently have.

(Another thing I just thought of is that this could cause DoS attacks on
the system if a user compromised root and then set the limit to a very
high number.)


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message