In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. Feldman" writes: : And how about having : if (securelevel > 3) : return (EPERM); : in bpf_open()? There are no security levels > 3. I'd be happy with > 0. This is consistant with the meaning of "raw devices". Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... David E. Cross
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERI... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERI... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GE... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf i... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling b... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Mike Smith
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling b... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh