Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC...

[Sergey Babkin]

Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. 
>Feldman" writes:
> : And how about having
> :       if (securelevel > 3)
> :               return (EPERM);
> : in bpf_open()?
> 
> There are no security levels > 3.  I'd be happy with > 0.  This is
> consistant with the meaning of "raw devices".

Disabling bpf it will break rarpd (and also rbootd but it is less 
important). I think such a thing should be mentioned in documentation.

-SB


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message