On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 05:42:57PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. >Feldman" writes: > : And how about having > : if (securelevel > 3) > : return (EPERM); > : in bpf_open()? > > There are no security levels > 3. I'd be happy with > 0. This is > consistant with the meaning of "raw devices". That would mean you can't run a secured DHCP server :( -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Matthew Dillon
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Josef Karthauser
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Ben Rosengart
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bill Fumerola
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Christopher Masto
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling b... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GE... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Nate Williams